[By Jerry W. Ward]
The
October 3 presidential debate was a capital example of America’s war of words
and visualized rhetoric. The spectacle
was ulotrichy. Viewers are still at a
loss to determine whether either debater said anything substantive regarding
the economy, health care, the role of government, or a philosophy of governing.
Things
would have been different and clearer had Ishmael Reed rather than James
Charles Lehrer been the debate moderator.
Reed would not have stayed out of the flow. He would have directed the debaters into the
superdome of history. Unlike Lehrer,
Reed understands that a presidential debate is predicated on America’s social and
racial contract and that one dividend of this contract is our nation’s contemporary
nervous breakdown.


