The American mind seems to have a
limited capacity for dealing with either the diachronic or synchronic aspects
of issues. That is unfortunate. However, if we seek to overcome those limits,
we discover a profound need to deal with the
absurd. In August 2012, we had
occasion to consider the excellent
absurdity of legitimate rape.
Representative Todd Akin of Missouri
said on public television”
It
seems to me, first of all, from what I understand from doctors, that’s really
rare. If it’s a legitimate rape, the
female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.
Had Akin momentarily become the
anti-hero of Voltaire’s novel Candide
and were his unguarded remarks informed
by the twisted beliefs of Dr. Pangloss?
Was he at all aware of what Mark Twain, a famous writer from Missouri,
had said about the madness of “rape” in King
Leopold’s Soliloquy? Perhaps
not. Few of our politicians can
demonstrate cultural literacy. But from
the angle of literary analysis, it seemed Akin had uttered a proposition about
“rape” that was itself “legitimated” by the genocidal “rape” of indigenous
peoples to obtain the Lebensraum that
is now the United States of America.
From the angles of cultural analysis and biology, it seemed Akin was
dead wrong, because “legitimate rape” of
the African female body during the period of slavery so frequently resulted in
pregnancy. Akin suffered from the convenient amnesia that for thousands of
years has made rape legitimate. Much of the outrage about his statement pertained,
I suspect, to his treachery in revealing a secret that was no secret.